Dec
7

Virtualization Wars: VMware vs. Hyper V: Which is Right For Your Virtual Environment?

Virtualization Wars: VMware vs. Hyper V: Which is Right For Your Virtual Environment?

December 7
By

Editor’s note: This article was originally published in May of 2013. It was updated in June of 2014, and again December of 2015. 

While new IT trends in backup, storage, and more are emerging at the speed of sound, virtualization continues to become the data center norm. According to Gartner, more than half of all server workloads are currently virtualized. That number is expected to rise to 86 percent in 2016.

Most of us look at the virtualization wars as a matter of two foes: VMware and Hyper-V. Stick with me as I nerd things up a bit. VMware reminds me of pro wrestling entertainment company WWE. It’s so big and so successful that the brand is synonymous with the industry itself.

Hyper-V reminds me of WWE rival TNA Wrestling. It’s a nice offering with a lot going for it, yet still plays the role of distant number two. These are easily the two biggest shows in town. But like the wrestling industry, the virtualization space is a great big world with more to offer than many of its fans even realize.

Gartner Group provided an interesting glimpse into the x86 server virtualization infrastructure market with its 2015 Magic Quandrant report. To no surprise, VMware and Microsoft came in as number one and number two on the leaderboard. While all other competitors were merely considered “niche players”, the report suggested that the field is far more competitive than a surface view may show.

VMware: Number One with a Bullet

According to Gartner, VMware is still a dominant force with a broad and sustainable market strategy. Like superstar wrestlers to WWE, VMware has a number of heavy-hitting products for virtualization and VM storage, each tailored to meet specialized IT needs. But if we’re talking a one on one encounter, then vSphere is the champ VMware is sending into the fight.

In the golden age of virtualization, VMware hypervisors didn’t do much outside of their core functionality. But they excelled at it. Vsphere, the franchise fighter, aims to simplify x86 server virtualization by leveraging a mix of brawn and sophistication. Sysadmins can count on this hypervisor heavyweight to take on demanding workloads, effortlessly hoist them into the cloud, and intelligently adapt to the most challenging IT environments. VMware may be a little flashy, but Gartner reports that products like vSphere still scores high marks in the area of customer satisfaction. That’s where it counts!

When it comes to investing in any technology, there usually isn’t any safer bet than the market leader(s). However, the areas in which the top dogs are lacking can be viewed as stepping stones competitors can use to make up ground. In the wrestling world, cheesy storylines, inconsistent booking decisions and WWE’s inability to create new superstars gives fans a reason to tune out and seek sports entertainment elsewhere. Based on the Gartner report, expensive offerings and the inability to embrace the right trends at the right time may eventually allow VMware challengers to lessen the gap.

Hyper-V: Second Place Purgatory

Microsoft first deployed Hyper-V into battle in Windows Server 2008 and continues to have prominence in Microsoft Server 2012 R2. Hyper-V shares a lot of similarities with the number two wrestling promotion I referenced earlier. Like TNA delivers a wrestling product that is every good as WWE in the ring, Hyper-V is a quality virtualization offering that helps IT departments tap into the true power of 64-bit computing. Microsoft’s contender is cost effective and very appealing to the many enterprises that already run a Windows-only infrastructure.

I don’t know how many wrestling fans are on the staff, but Gartner seems to see Microsoft’s struggles similarly to how I view TNA. Despite its ability to create awareness and grab the number two spot, Hyper-V is still having trouble catching on with the diehards who give all praise to VMware. It’s kind of like the members of the WWE Universe who refuse to give TNA a chance. And as TNA struggles to reach the top of the mountain, it has allowed other smaller promotions to catch up. Microsoft is facing the same struggle as open source challengers continue to creep up on its tail.

The Rest of the Field

Every market leader has to start somewhere, and that’s encouraging for niche players like Oracle. IT geeks might look at Oracle like Ring of Honor (ROH). Pound for pound, product for product they’ve got the potential to be number one. But constructed as is, their strategy will only take them so far. Gartner’s assessment falls in line with this quasi-warped line of thinking.

Some say ROH delivers the best wrestling on the planet. The in-ring product is as crisp and fluid as can be. Unfortunately, the production values are questionable and the company’s vision is too narrow to ever be a serious threat to the McMahon empire. That second part definitely sounds like a familiar database giant.

The Magic Quadrant report identified Oracle as a competitor with a strong line of products that can deliver the optimal performance enterprise demands from virtualization. It also highlighted the company’s persistent push of an Oracle-only product stack as a potentially major flaw that limits its market appeal to IT departments seeking a homogeneous environment.

Red Hat is another niche player to keep an eye on. For the sake of this post, we’ll consider these guys  the Lucha Underground of virtualization. A relative newcomer, Lucha Underground offers an exciting brand of pro wrestling inspired by the luchadore tradition that is still a big deal in Mexico to this day. While it isn’t necessarily knocking on the doors of WWE or TNA, it’s exciting, surging, and tinkering with a trend that could spark the next industry boon – a return to the old school grit that appeals to the hardcore fans WWE continues to drive away with family-friendly programming.

While Red Hat maintains the biggest commercial Linux distribution, it holds on tightly to the open source roots that helped catapult the firm to enterprise fame. Gartner pointed out that Red Hat needs to be more aggressive in marketing its virtualization offering in order to generate the sales that are essential to its very survival. It also pointed to niche appeal as a potential strong suite. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) is particularly sexy to those interested in Linux-based workloads, and its investment in a cloud-centric stack is firmly on track with one of the biggest storage and virtualization industry trends.

Trending Towards the Best of Virtualization

The Internet Wrestling Community (IWC) is full of smarks—wrestling fans who are probably a little too smart for their own good. Sure, they’re a little annoying, but these fans realize that other, potentially better options exist outside of WWE and TNA rings. IT smarks are discovering that better virtualization solutions may exist in trends like containers and integration with cloud computing, the gift that just keeps on giving.

Containers and virtual machines aim to accomplish the same goal – containers just do it more efficiently. Like a VM, a container has an OS, file system, and network that can be accessed as if run on a physical or virtual machine. Unlike a VM, a container allows applications, resources, and processes to run cleanly in isolated packages without impacting the rest of the system. A slim, simplified approach to isolation is the reason this phenomenon and its associated ecosystem is being hailed as the next generation of virtualization.

The container concept has the power to not only revolutionize the development field, but IT as a whole. Developers can use it to create portable applications that run in any environment – server or laptop, private or public cloud – saving more time and using fewer resources. For IT departments, containers offer a stable environment for each stage of development, testing, and production. Plus, container management offers all the extensive capabilities of a hypervisor, while enabling admins to create infrastructures that are easier to update and maintain.

The overall consensus is that hybrid clouds are the next logical step up from the virtual infrastructure. Hybrid environments allow IT to further bolster virtualization by optimizing key areas like disaster recovery.  When disaster strikes, organizations need the ability to replicate data to various storage targets like private clouds in the data center to public clouds offsite and back again. A hybrid cloud enables sysadmins to execute this extensive process in fast and effective fashion – all from a centralized interface that makes everything easy to manage.

The Future of Virtualization

The pains of today’s wrestling industry can be felt in the cries of the IWC, the loudest voice of the community. Kayfabe is dead thanks to the luxury fans have access to inside information. On one hand, fans seemingly know too much and are in turn, harder to please. On the other, pleasing them may very well be as simple as listening to their chatter across the dirt sheets, social networks, and message boards. Less talking. More wrestling. Less shoving Vince’s Chosen Ones down their throats. More pushing wrestlers who gain organic fan support.

Comparatively speaking, it could be a similar case for the topic at hand. The victor in the virtualization wars may turn out to be the player that conveniently serves up the trends enterprise IT teams have in their sights. VMware is sitting comfortable. Microsoft has made strides. But with containers on the rise and hybrid clouds making more sense than ever, even the niche players may have something to say about who makes their mark in this intensely competitive arena.

So which are you siding with? Is VMware still the standard for enterprise virtualization, has Hyper-V finally won you over, or is there another option you favor?

 

If you’re curious about how the free hypervisor options stack up, take a look at our take on VMware vs. VirtualBox

 

  • ▾ Comments

    1. Peter Oden on

      I’ve been using VMware since the late 1990’s. VMware has the monolithic hypervisor in it’s server class products (as you described), plus an approach similar to Microsoft’s in it’s workstation class product known as VMware Workstation. I’ve been using VMware Workstation installed on top of Microsoft Server OSs for several reasons. All my production-level servers are running as Guests on such a platform. Cost savings include availability of commodity priced utilities for backup, anti-malware and such…

      In my experience, since 1981 in the software and server-room domains, Microsoft’s periodic and frequent changes to its entire architecture has forced me to re-install, re-code, re-invest time and money, just to stay current and operational. I’ll stick with VMware for my virtualization platforms, as it has required less maintenance, cost and re-work.

    2. Larry on

      Wow is this for real? You cover how easily a host can get a virus and how the tech runs at the base level?

      Has a vmware host ever gotten hacked or got a virus?

      Has a windows computer ever gotten hacked or got a virus?

      I almost spit out my water when I read the part about Hyper V and stability. We have both Hyper V (2008 R2/2012) and VMware. Some REAL facts.

      * We have gone over a year on some of our vmware clusters with out patching or rebooting a host. NONE of our Hyper V hosts have reached 90 days.

      * Install and setup of a clustered Hyper V host takes about 10 times longer than a clustered VMware host.

      * Upgrading a Hyper V cluster….IS NOT POSSIBLE. You cant have two versions in the same cluster so you must build a new cluster and migrate the VM’s over. The migration requires downtime for all VM’s on a SAN volume. Ugrading a typical 8 node VMware cluster takes about 90min as upgrade the hosts one at a time and reboot them. (VMware supports mixed versions on a cluster.)

      * Many functions in Hyper V are POWERSHELL only. For instance you cant mass upgrade the “VM additions” in SCVMM unless a guest is off. In VMware you can highlight 50 (or more) running VM’s and update the vm tools. It requires a reboot but the effort is 10x easier to complete.

      * We have NEVER had a VMware host go down, at all, not once. We have had MANY hyper v hosts drop all of their VM’s for many different reasons. 99% of the time its YET ANOTHER hotfix you cant get from Windows update, to fix a storeport driver, or a MPIO issue, or a failover cluster issue. There is NO WAY we would run our production servers on Hyper V.

      * Drivers….for Hyper V you can get them from your hardware vendor (Dell, HP, etc) or Microsoft, or right from say Intel or Broadcom. Often MS Premiere support will tell us to go to the NIC drivers sight and get the driver vs the Microsoft driver or the Dell driver when we have a problem. VMware…..gives you the ONLY drivers you need. Yes they re-package the vendor drivers but you get them from one source, they are tested and supported.

      A real comparison is not a technical white paper, its in the trench usage of these products.

    3. John Myers on

      The price of a microlized hypervisor is in case of Hyper-V, that it is to large to get fully loaded into the RAM. This could have backdraws if you lost the contact to the boot volume. I found an impressive demonstration about this topic @Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8ZF0ez0iH0
      In case of this, it seems VMware has still the better product.

    Leave a Reply

    • (will not be published)